Muslim Marriage and Divorces (Registration) Rules 1975 | Case Reference
Muslim Marriage and Divorces (Registration) Rules 1974
There was no requirement of law for
serving notice prior to issuing the reducing jurisdiction letter. Md. Saiful
Islam vs Md. Abdur Rahim (Md. Ruhul Amin J) (Civil) IADC 190
Muslim Marriage and Divorces
(Registration) Rules 1975
Cancelling the temporary appointment of
the petitioner as the Nikah Registrar and appointing the respondent No.4 as
permanent Nikah Registrar of No.2 Khan Marich Union under Bhangoora Upazila
District Pabna as contained in Annexure-F to the writ petition Md. Tarique Bin
Shukur vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh (Mohammad Fazlul
Karim J) (Civil) 4ADC 557
Muslim Marriage and Divorces
(Registration) Rules 1975
Rule 6
From the above, it is clear that the
petitioner is not even qualified to be appointed as Nikah Registrar. There is,
however, no provision either in the Muslim. Marriages and Divorces
(Registration) Rules, 1975 to appoint a person not having the above educational
qualification. Even the concerned authority does not have such power. Farooq
Ahmed vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh (Syed J.R.
Mudassir Husain CJ) (Civil) 4ADC 560
The Muslim Marriages & Divorces
Rules, 1975
Rule 6(1)
Requiring him to show cause within
seven days as to why his Nikah registry licence should not be cancelled. Hafez
Md. Bilal patwary VS. Government of Bangladesh (M.M. Ruhul Amin J) (Civil) 5
ADC 678
Muslim Marriages and Divorces
(Registration) Rules, 1975
Rule 6
From the above, it is clear that the
petitioner is not even qualified to be appointed as Nikah Registrar. There is.
however, no provision either in the Muslim Marriages and and Divorces
(Registration) Rules, 1975 to appoint a person not having the above educational
qualification. Even the concerned authority does not have such power. Farooq
Ahmed vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh (Syed J.R.
Mudassir Husain CJM(Civil) 4ADC 560
Rule 6, 11
The legality of the order of
curtailment of the area and also on the ground that the appellant being not a
resident of the area was not eligible for the licence and as such the High
Court Division com- mitted error making the Rule absolute in his favour and the
judgment being con- trary to law cannot sustain. Md. Yousuf Ali -vs- Kazi Syed
Shamsul Hoque and others (Mohammad Fazlul Karim J) (Civil) 3ADC 722
Muslim Marriage and Divorces (Registration) Rules 1975
Rule 11
The legality of the order of curtailment of the area and also on the ground that the appellant being not a resident of the area was not eligible for the licence and as such the High Court Division.com- mitted error making the Rule absolute in his favour and the judgment being con- trary to law cannot sustain. Md. Yousuf Ali-vs- Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others (Mohammad Fazlul Karim J (Civil) 3 ADC 722