рж╕াрж░্ржЪ ржЗржи্ржЯাрж░ржлেрж╕ে ржЖржкржиাржХে рж╕্ржмাржЧрждржо

ржЖржкржиি ржПржЦাржиে ржЖржкржиাрж░ ржХাржЩ্ржХ্рж╖িржд рждрже্ржп рж╕рж╣ржЬে ржЦুঁржЬে ржкেрждে ржкাрж░েржи। ржиিрж░্ржжিрж╖্ржЯ рж╢ржм্ржж ржмা рж╕ংржЦ্ржпা рж▓িржЦে рж╕াрж░্ржЪ ржХрж░ুржи। ржПрж░ржкрж░ ржбাржи ржжিржХেрж░ ржЖржк ржПржи্ржб ржбাржЙржи ржЖржЗржХржиে ржХ্рж▓িржХ ржХрж░ে ржЙржкрж░ে ржиিржЪে ржпাржи।

рж╣ুржмрж╣ু ржоিрж▓
ржХিржЫুржЯা ржоিрж▓

Vicarious Liability | Case Reference

рж▓িржЧ্ржпাрж▓ ржнрзЯেрж╕


рж╕рждрж░্ржХীржХрж░ржг! ржХেрж╕ рж░েржлাрж░েржи্рж╕ ржУрзЯেржмрж╕াржЗржЯে ржк্рж░ржХাрж╢িржд ржЕржзিржХাংрж╢ ржиржЬীрж░ ржмিржнিржи্ржи ржмржЗ ржУ ржУрзЯেржмрж╕াржЗржЯ ржеেржХে рж╕ংржЧ্рж░рж╣ ржХрж░া рж╣рзЯেржЫে। ржПржЗ рж╕ржХрж▓ ржиржЬীрж░ ржПрж░ рж╕ржаিржХрждাрж░ ржмিрж╖рзЯে ржХেрж╕ рж░েржлাрж░েржи্рж╕ ржУрзЯেржмрж╕াржЗржЯ ржХোржи ржиিрж╢্ржЪрзЯрждা ржк্рж░ржжাржи ржХрж░ে ржиা। ржХেрж╕ рж░েржлাрж░েржи্рж╕ ржУрзЯেржмрж╕াржЗржЯে ржк্рж░ржХাрж╢িржд ржиржЬীрж░ ржПрж░ ржЙржкрж░ ржиিрж░্ржнрж░ ржПрж░ ржЖржЧে рж╕ংрж╢্рж▓িрж╖্ржЯ ржиржЬীрж░ржЯিрж░ рж░েржлাрж░েржи্рж╕ ржоিрж▓িрзЯে ржиেржУрзЯাрж░ ржЕржиুрж░োржз ржХрж░া рж╣ржЪ্ржЫে।


To sum up, there is almost unanimous judicial opinion that necessary averments ought to be contained in a complaint before a person can be subjected to criminal process. A liability under Section 141 of the Act is sought to be fastened vicariously on a person connected with a company, the principal accused being the company itself. It is a departure from the rule in criminal law against vicarious liability. A clear case should be spelled out in the complaint against the person sought to be made liable. Section 141 of the Act contains the requirements for making a person liable under the said provision. That the respondent falls within the parameters of Section 141 has to be spelled out. A complaint has to be examined by the Magistrate in the first instance on the basis of averments contained therein. If the Magistrate is satisfied that there are averments which bring the case within Section 141, he would issue the process. We have seen that merely being described as a director in a company is not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of Section 141. Even a non-director can be liable under Section 141 of the Act. The averments in the complaint would also serve the purpose that the person sought to be made liable would know what is the case which is alleged against him. This will enable him to meet the case at the trial." Pawan Kumar Goel vs State Of U.P.


Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."

Post a Comment

Join the conversation