Case Reference

Anytime, Anywhere

+88 01911 008 518

Central Excise Rules, 1944 | Case Reference



Central Excise Rules, 1944


Rule 173-C-We are of the considered opinion that the Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty from Rs.2,06,000/- to Rs.50,000/-. Indeed, the Tribunal, in our failed opinion, to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile Processors (supra) which the Tribunal was bound to take while deciding the appeal and instead the Tribunal wrongly placed reliance on its own decision in the case of Escorts JCB Ltd. vs CCE 2000 (118) ELT 650 (Tribunal). We also find that the Tribunal gave no justifiable legal reasons for reducing the penalty amount. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh =VS= M/s Stesalit Ltd., [3 LM (SC) 11]

 
Case Reference | All rights reserved.
Developed by Case Reference
Disclaimer

This website provides case citations and case notes only, not full judgments. The information has been collected from various online and offline sources for research and reference purposes. While we strive for accuracy, users are strongly advised to verify the original judgment or official source before relying on any case note provided here.

অনুবাদ করুন